Prevalence of face mask related complications among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia.

INTRODUCTION: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, most healthcare workers (HCWs) were required to wear face masks for long periods of time. Since then, it has been shown that face masks have the potential to cause several physical adverse effects. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of face mask-related complications among HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, we compared the relationship between face mask usage with other variables, including the type of mask used and gender. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was conducted using convenience sampling, with a targeted sample of 517 participants (35% nonresponse). Data was collected via an electronic survey, the link for which was distributed through social media sites, such as WhatsApp and Twitter, to reach HCWs across Saudi Arabia. Data was analyzed using the SPSS software. RESULTS: Overall, 438 HCWs who wore N95 or surgical masks for 4 hours or more per day on average were recruited. Skin-related complications in the nasal area had the highest prevalence (342, 78.1%), followed by behind the ear area (333, 76.0%), cheeks (307, 70.1%), and chin (248, 56.6%). Other complications included headaches (226, 51.6%), and eye-related complications (211, 48.2%). All face mask-related complications, except for behind the ear skin complications, were more associated with female gender. CONCLUSIONS: Mask usage was significantly associated with the development of headaches, and eye, and skin-related complications. Female HCWs were more predisposed to these complications. Preventative measures and awareness activities should be considered to help reduce mask use related complications.

The impact of prolonged face mask use on ocular surface health during COVID-19 pandemic: a clinical, and conjunctiva impression cytology study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between prolonged face mask use and ocular surface health utilizing conjunctival impression cytology, the Schirmer test, the tear break-up time (TBUT) test, and the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire. METHODS: In this cross-sectional prospective study, individuals who used face masks for at least eight hours per day for at least six months were compared to healthy volunteers who used face masks for no more than one hour per day. Each participant completed an OSDI questionnaire. The Schirmer test (under anesthesia), the TBUT test, and conjunctiva impression cytology analysis according to the Nelson classification method were performed on each participant. RESULTS: This study included 102 (49 male, 53 female) face mask users with an average age of 33.29 ± 7.71 years and 110 (60 male, 50 female) healthy controls with an average age of 32.96 ± 7.10 years (p = 0.746). The total OSDI score was significantly higher in face mask users than the control group (25.18 ± 3.54 vs 9.46 ± 2.13, p < 0.001). The mean Schirmer test value and TBUT were significantly lower in the study group than the control group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in total score and stage of the Nelson classification system (p < 0.001, and p = 0.024, respectively). All conjunctiva impression cytology assessments, including cellularity, cell-cell contact, nucleus/cytoplasma ratio, goblet cell amount, and metaplasia, revealed statistically significant deterioration in the study group compared to the control group (p < 0.001, p = 0.025, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The prolonged use of face masks leads to dry eyes. The findings of conjunctiva impression cytology indicate the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of mask associated dry eye.

A highly soluble form of rutin for instant resolution of mask-wearing related disorders.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic brought about a new normal, necessitating the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) like face shields, surgical masks, gloves, and goggles. However, prolonged mask-wearing introduced skin-related issues due to changes in the skin's microenvironment, including increased humidity and temperature, as well as pressure on the skin. These factors led to skin deformation, vascular issues, edema, and inflammation, resulting in discomfort and cosmetic concerns. Clinical reports quickly highlighted the consequences of long-term mask use, including increased cases of "maskne" (mask-related acne) or mask-wearing related disorders such as rosacea flare-ups, skin-barrier defects, itching, erythema, redness, hyperpigmentation, and lichenification. Some of these issues, like inflammation, oxidative stress, and poor wound healing, could be directly linked to acne-related disorders or skin hypoxia. AIM: To address these problems, researchers turned to rutin, a well-known flavonoid with antioxidant, vasoactive, and anti-inflammatory properties. However, rutin's poor water solubility presented a challenge for cosmetic formulations. To overcome this limitation, a highly water-soluble form of rutin was developed, making it suitable for use at higher concentrations. METHODS: In vitro and ex vivo tests were conducted, as well as an innovative clinical trial including volunteers wearing surgical masks for at least 2 h, to evaluate the biological activity of this soluble rutin on the main skin concerns associated with mask-wearing (inflammation, oxidative stress, skin repair, hyperpigmentation, and skin redness). RESULTS: The in vitro results showed that the active ingredient significantly reduced oxidative stress, improved wound healing, and reduced inflammation. In dark skin explants, the active ingredient significantly reduced melanin content, indicating its lightening activity. This effect was confirmed in the clinical study, where brown spots decreased significantly after 4 days of application. Moreover, measurements on volunteers demonstrated a decrease in skin redness and vascularization after the active ingredient application, indicating inflammation and erythema reduction. Volunteers reported improved skin comfort. CONCLUSION: In summary, the COVID-19 pandemic led to various skin issues associated with mask-wearing. A highly soluble form of rutin was developed, which effectively addressed these concerns by reducing inflammation, oxidative stress, and hyperpigmentation while promoting wound healing. This soluble rutin offers a promising solution for the rapid treatment of maskne-related disorders and other skin problems caused by prolonged mask use.

NO EFFECT OF REAL-WORLD UNIVERSAL FACE MASKING ON POST-INTRAVITREAL INJECTION ENDOPHTHALMITIS RATE AT A SINGLE TERTIARY ACADEMIC CENTER.

PURPOSE: To determine whether universal masking during COVID-19 altered rate and outcomes of postinjection endophthalmitis. METHODS: Retrospective, single-site, comparative, cohort study. Eyes diagnosed with endophthalmitis within 4 weeks of intravitreal injection at the University of Michigan from August 1, 2012, to November 15, 2022, were identified. Cases were considered "masking" between March 15, 2020, and November 15, 2022. Endophthalmitis rate, visual acuity, and microbial spectrum were investigated. RESULTS: There were 20 postinjection endophthalmitis cases out of 72,194 injections (0.028%; one in 3,571 injections) premasking and 10 of 38,962 with universal masking (0.026%; one in 3,846 injections; odds ratio 0.9; 95% [confidence interval]: 0.4-2.0). Referral from the community was unchanged with 32 cases referred premasking (0.35 cases/month) and 10 cases with masking (0.31 cases/month). Presenting mean the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity with masking of all postinjection endophthalmitis cases trended worse (2.35 ± 0.40) compared with premasking (2.09 ± 0.48; P = 0.05) with light perception visual acuity more common with masking (31.6% vs. 10.9%, P = 0.06). There was no delay in time from procedure to initial treatment ( P = 0.36), no difference in the rate of initial treatment with tap and inject (T/I), and similar positive-culture rates ( P = 0.77) between the cohorts. Visual acuity after 30 days of follow-up was clinically unchanged (∼20/500 vs. 20/400; P = 0.59). CONCLUSION: Universal masking had no effect on postinjection endophthalmitis rate or on the rate of culture-positive cases. Although presenting visual acuity appeared worse with masking, this was not statistically significant, and current treatment paradigms resulted in similar visual outcomes.

Pressure Masks for Facial Scar Treatment after Oncological Reconstruction: Long-Term Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life.

INTRODUCTION: With increasing incidence of facial skin cancer, more patients undergo facial reconstruction following Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). Aesthetically unpleasing, thickened facial flaps, and disturbing scars can be treated with a pressure mask with inner silicone lining to help improve functional and aesthetic outcomes. However, data on long-term patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) following this treatment are lacking. METHODS: We aimed to assess long-term satisfaction and QoL of patients who underwent local flap reconstruction following MMS. Patients treated between January 2012 and October 2020 were invited to answer FACE-Q and SCAR-Q questionnaires. Demographic data, skin cancer type and location, type of reconstruction, postoperative complications, duration of pressure mask therapy, daily compliance, and additional scar treatment were collected to explore possible predictors. RESULTS: Of 92 eligible patients, 50 responded. Eighteen respondents were male (36%) and 32 were female (64%). Mean duration of pressure mask therapy was 10.20 ± 4.61 months. Patients were 61.14 ± 32.91 months after completion of pressure mask therapy upon participation. Patients whose reconstruction consisted of multiple flaps had significantly worse outcomes in social function (p = 0.012), scar appearance (p = 0.045), and scar symptoms (p = 0.008). A trend of increasing time since therapy completion predicting better outcomes was observed for all scales, and it was a significant predictor for better scar appearance (p = 0.001) and less scar symptoms (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pressure mask treatment for facial flaps and scars following MMS results in good long-term patient satisfaction and QoL. Multiple local flaps, reflecting a larger skin defect postexcision, is a predictor for worse outcomes in social function, scar appearance, and symptoms. Increasing time is associated with increasing satisfaction, which reflects satisfactory and stable long-term effects of treatment, possibly combined with more acceptance of the result over time.

Initial evidence that skin health deteriorates for younger age groups and with increased daily use of face masks for healthcare professionals at a dental hospital in the United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and site of any adverse effects of wearing face masks via an online questionnaire. METHODS: Healthcare workers in a dental hospital who wear Respiratory Protective Equipment (RPE) were invited to participate. An online questionnaire was used to identify adverse effects as a result of wearing face masks and possible remedies. RESULTS: Red marks (72.1 %) and indentations (66.7 %) were the most frequently reported issues with increased use of the RPE. The bridge of the nose and cheeks were the most frequently reported sites of facial skin problems, such as blanching (54.1 % and 42.2 %, respectively) and pressure damage (42.3 % and 24.3 %, respectively). Overall perceived facial skin health deteriorated strongly and significantly (P < 0.001) following the use of RPE, where the mean skin health score (0 = best possible skin health and 10 = worst possible skin health) increased from 2.68 to 4.76. Broadly, there was increased discomfort with increased hours of use of RPE per day (P = 0.049). 71 % of participants said that they generally felt safe or very safe using RPE. CONCLUSION: The facial skin health of respondents deteriorated strongly after the use of RPE. Guidelines for using RPE should be made clearer. A greater range of face mask sizes or bespoke masks should be made available to improve the fit and wearability, as well as to reduce the frequency and incidence of surface skin problems. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study has identified the factors influencing adverse skin reactions from face mask use, which can be used to inform face mask designers and manufacturers to improve the fit and wearability of face masks.

Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic related chondrodermatitis nodularis helicis: the role of masks.

BACKGROUND: Chondrodermatitis nodularis helicis is a benign, but painful inflammatory condition of the ear, characterised by a tender nodule located on the helix or antihelix. This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of chondrodermatitis nodularis helicis associated with the use of coronavirus disease 2019 masks during the pandemic. METHOD: A retrospective single-centre study was performed from February 2020 to February 2022 in the Maxillo-Facial Unit at the University Hospital of Siena, Italy. RESULTS: During the indexed period, 11 patients were affected by chondrodermatitis nodularis helicis. All patients wore a mask for more than 8 hours a day, every day for several months. CONCLUSION: Although there is no certain proof of the correlation between masks and chondrodermatitis nodularis helicis, an increase in the incidence of this condition was highlighted in our single-centre experience in the pandemic period. The prolonged use of coronavirus disease 2019 masks may explain this correlation.

Manufacture and use of transparent facial orthotic masks for treating facial burn scars: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Custom-made transparent facial orthoses (TFOs) (face masks) are used to improve facial burn scars. We conducted a systematic literature review on TFO manufacture and use. METHODS: Pubmed and Cochrane databases were searched without restrictions for relevant articles. TFO manufacture details and use according to international recommendations (20-32 mmHg pressure, TFO worn 20-23 h/day for ≥2 months) were extracted. RESULTS: Of 279 retrieved articles, 11 published over the last 41 years (four in the last 5 years) discussed TFO manufacture/use. There were five technical notes, five case reports, and a patient-cohort study (total patients in the studies=21). TFO-manufacture methods could be categorized as classical, digital, or mixed classical-digital. Relative clinical efficacies and cost advantages were unclear. The plastics used, harness materials, harness-point number, and silicone-interface use differed from study to study. Target pressure, actual pressure, expected daily wearing time, and treatment duration ranged widely and often did not meet current guidelines. Actual wearing time and treatment duration were never measured. CONCLUSIONS: Although TFOs play an important global role in burn care, there is a grave paucity of research. Further research is needed to promote the standardization of TFO-related practices and thereby improve the outcomes of facial-burn patients.

Effect of different noninvasive ventilation interfaces on the prevention of facial pressure injury: A network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of different noninvasive ventilation interfaces on preventing the facial pressure injury. METHODS: This network meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA reporting guidelines. Seven electronic databases were systematically searched for randomised controlled trials about the comparative effectiveness of different interfaces in preventing facial pressure injury with noninvasive ventilation in adults and newborns from inception to June 2023. The acronym of PICOS was used and the keywords as well as inclusion/exclusion criteria were determined. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the methodological quality. RESULTS: A total of 78 randomised controlled trials involving 7,291 patients were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that the effectiveness of the eight noninvasive ventilation interfaces on the prevention of facial pressure injury was in the order of: nasal cannula > full-face mask > rotation of nasal mask with nasal prongs > helmet > nasal mask > oronasal mask > nasal prongs > face mask. The use of full-face mask in adults and nasal cannula in newborns had the best effect on preventing the incidence of facial pressure injury. CONCLUSIONS: The use of full-face mask in adults and nasal cannula in newborns had the most clinical advantage in preventing the incidence of facial pressure injury and were worthy promoting in clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study provides a certain theoretical basis for the selection of appropriate interface for patients with noninvasive ventilation. Clinical practitioners should choose the appropriate interfaces based on the patient's specific condition to reduce the incidence of facial pressure injury, enhance patient comfort, and improve the effectiveness of respiratory therapy.

Potential adverse effects of face mask use on cardiopulmonary function and thermoregulation in robotic stroke rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic led to the implementation of wearing face masks and social distancing in stroke rehabilitation to prevent airborne transmission and contain the virus. The use of masks causes hypoxia and dyspnea in patients with stroke, predisposing them to other harmful medical conditions. Despite the clinical importance of the potential risk of wearing masks during robotic stroke rehabilitation, no clinical evidence is available in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of stroke robotic rehabilitation with and without using a face mask on cardiopulmonary fatigue, muscle fatigue, O2 saturation, pulse, blood pressure (BP), and temperature in healthy adults and patients with hemiparetic stroke. METHOD: A total of 30 participants, comprising 20 males and 10 females, were enrolled in a case-control study and a cross-sectional randomized controlled trial conducted at the Center for Rehabilitation Hospital. The study population included 15 individuals with hemiparetic stroke (mean age: 57.26±8.69) and 15 healthy adult controls (mean age: 30.20±9.86). All participants underwent a 30-minute familiarization session, followed by experimental masked and unmasked robotic interactive gait training (RIGT) for at least 30 minutes. Clinical tests included the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion, muscle fatigue via surface electromyography, O2 saturation, pulse, BP, and temperature. RESULTS: An analysis of covariance showed that compared to RIGT without a mask, RIGT with a mask showed adverse effects on BRPE, O2 saturation, and right rectus femoris muscle fatigue (P < 0.05) in the control and experimental groups. CONCLUSION: The clinical study revealed that compared to RIGT without a mask, RIGT with a mask affected cardiopulmonary fatigue, muscle fatigue, O2 saturation, pulse, and BP in healthy adults and participants with hemiparetic stroke.

Exerted force on the face mask in preterm infants at birth is associated with apnoea and bradycardia.

BACKGROUND: During stabilisation of preterm infants at birth, a face mask is used to provide respiratory support. However, application of these masks may activate cutaneous stretch receptors of the trigeminal nerve, causing apnoea and bradycardia. This study investigated the amount of force exerted on the face mask during non-invasive ventilation of preterm infants at birth and whether the amount of exerted force is associated with apnoea and bradycardia. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed in preterm infants born <32 weeks of gestation who were stabilised at birth. During the first 10 minutes of respiratory support, we measured breathing and heart rate as well as the amount of force exerted on a face mask using a custom-made pressure sensor placed on top of the face mask. RESULTS: Thirty infants were included (median (IQR) gestational age(GA) 28+3 (27+0-30+0) weeks, birthweight 1104 (878-1275) grams). The median exerted force measured was 297 (198-377) grams, ranging from 0 to 1455 grams. Significantly more force was exerted on the face mask during positive pressure ventilation when compared to CPAP (410 (256-556) vs 286 (190-373) grams, p = 0.009). In a binary logistic regression model, higher forces were associated with an increased risk of apnoea (OR = 1.607 (1.556-1.661), p < 0.001) and bradycardia (OR = 1.140 (1.102-1.180), p < 0.001) during the first 10 minutes of respiratory support at birth. CONCLUSION: During mask ventilation, the median exerted force on a face mask was 297 grams with a maximum of 1455 grams. Higher exerted forces were associated apnoea and bradycardia during the first 10 minutes of respiratory support at birth.

Full-face snorkel masks increase the incidence of hypoxaemia and hypercapnia during simulated snorkelling compared to conventional snorkels.

Introduction: Air flow in full-face snorkel masks (FFSMs) should be unidirectional to prevent rebreathing of exhaled air. This study evaluated rebreathing and its consequences when using FFSMs compared to a conventional snorkel. Methods: In a dry environment 20 participants wore three types of snorkel equipment in random order: Subea Easybreath FFSM; QingSong 180-degree panoramic FFSM; and a Beuchat Spy conventional snorkel (with nose clip), in three conditions: rest in a chair; light; and moderate intensity exercise on a cycle ergometer. Peripheral oxygen saturation, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) and oxygen (PO2) in the end tidal gas and FFSM eye-pockets, respiratory rate, minute ventilation, were measured continuously. Experiments were discontinued if oxygen saturation dropped below 85%, or if end-tidal CO2 exceeded 7.0 kPa. Results: Experimental runs with the FFSMs had to be discontinued more often after exceeding 7.0 kPa end-tidal CO2 compared to a conventional snorkel e.g., 18/40 (45%) versus 4/20 (20%) during light intensity exercise, and 9/22 (41%) versus 3/16 (19%) during moderate intensity exercise. Thirteen participants exhibited peripheral oxygen saturations below 95% (nine using FFSMs and four using the conventional snorkel) and five fell below 90% (four using FFSMs and one using the conventional snorkel). The PCO2 and PO2 in the eye-pockets of the FFSMs fluctuated and were significantly higher and lower respectively than in inspired gas, which indicated rebreathing in all FFSM wearers. Conclusions: Use of FFSMs may result in rebreathing due to non-unidirectional flow, leading to hypercapnia and hypoxaemia.

Fin del uso de la mascarilla en espacios públicos durante la pandemia por la COVID-19: impacto en la salud mental de las mujeres embarazadas / End of the use of masks in public spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic: impact on the mental health of pregnant women

Background: COVID-19 has affected the entire population, generating a greater impact on certain vulnerable groups, such as pregnant women. The aim of this study was to evaluate the levels of fear and anxiety regarding the COVID-19 disease in pregnant women, using the AMICO_Pregnant scale, in the final phase of the health crisis caused by the disease, marked by the relaxation of isolation measures in public spaces. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study using the self-reported questionnaire AMICO_Pregnant was developed between March 24 and April 18, 2022. This was followed by a univariate and bivariate statistical analysis of the data collected. Results: A total of 479 surveys of pregnant women of different gestational ages were obtained. The bivariate analysis showed statistical significance in the AMICO_Pregnant scale score about several variables over the previous year: contact with the disease (p=0.025); number of previous pregnancies (p=0.019); changes in the birth plan (p=0.001); and vaccination status (p=0.01). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted pregnant women’s mental health, producing a negative effect on emotions. The research carried out shows a statistically significant relationship between the levels of fear and anxiety in pregnant women and factors such as the number of previous pregnancies, contact with the previous disease, vaccination level or expectations regarding the delivery or birth plan.(AU)

Fundamentos: La COVID-19 ha afectado a toda la población, generando un mayor impacto en determinados grupos vulnerables, como es el caso de las mujeres gestantes. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar los niveles de miedo y ansiedad a la COVID-19 en la mujer gestante, mediante la escala AMICO_Gestante, en la fase final de la crisis sanitaria causada por dicha enfermedad, marcada porel relajamiento de las medidas de aislamiento en espacios públicos. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal descriptivo mediante el uso de cuestionario autoinformadoAMICO_Gestante, desarrollado entre el 24 de marzo y el 18 de abril de 2022. Tras ello, se ejecutó un análisis estadístico univariado y bivariado de los datos recogidos. Resultados: Se obtuvieron un total de 479 encuestas de mujeres gestantes de diferente edad gestacional. El análisis bivariado mostró significación estadística en la puntuación de la escala AMICO_Gestante en relación con varias variables en relación al año anterior: contacto con la enfermedad (p=0,025); número de embarazos previos (p=0,019); cambios en el plan de parto (p=0,001); y estado vacunacional (p=0,01). Conclusiones: La pandemia por la COVID-19 tiene un impacto en la salud mental de la mujer gestante, produciendo un efecto negativo en las emociones. La investigación realizada muestra una relación estadísticamente significativa entre los niveles de miedo y ansiedad en la mujer gestante y factores como el número de embarazos previos, el contacto con la enfermedad previa, el nivel de vacunación o las expectativas en relación al plan de parto o nacimiento.(AU)

Partial transection of the external ear caused by a mask worn for COVID-19 protection.

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic surgical mask-wearing was widely adopted as a means of preventing infections, but there have been several reports of mask-induced skin problems. In this report, we describe a case in which surgery was required for a mask-induced ear injury. CASE REPORT: An otherwise healthy 63-year-old male presented to the plastic surgery department with an auricle injury. He had been using a mask that was too small for his face for more than 1 month; the tight ear loops caused the upper part of his left auricle to begin to dissect, resulting in a large tear. More than a third of the left upper auricle was torn, and the wound surface was epithelialized. The patient had no history of skin disease or psychiatric disorder but was engaged in a job that required wearing a helmet constantly. Surgery was performed to refresh the epithelialized wound surface and suture it, and the patient healed without complication. CONCLUSION: While mask-wearing mandates and recommendations have considerably eased since the height of the pandemic, the current authors' experience has brought to light problems related to mask usage. Thus, efforts should be made to investigate the causes of these problems and provide appropriate advice.

Impact of wearing a surgical facemask during exercise on dyspnea in patients with chronic pulmonary infections: A randomized crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Wearing facemasks in public is effective in preventing viral transmission. However, no study has evaluated the impact of wearing facemasks during exercise on dyspnea in patients with chronic pulmonary infections from multifaceted aspects, including sensory qualities and emotional responses. The aim of this study was to evaluate facemask-related dyspnea during exercise in this patient population. METHODS: We conducted a randomized crossover study involving adult patients with non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) or bronchiectasis who participated in exercise sessions, both with (mask-on) and without (mask-off) surgical facemasks. The sensory and emotional dimensions of dyspnea during each exercise session were assessed using the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile. Statistical analyses were performed to identify factors associated with worsening scores for each dimension. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (mean age [standard deviation]: 71.6 [8.6] years) were included in the analysis. The median [interquartile range] total scores for the sensory and emotional dimensions of dyspnea were 3.5 [1, 9.5] (mask-off) vs. 10 [5.5, 23.8] (mask-on) (P < 0.001) and 0 [0, 5] (mask-off) vs. 3 [0.8, 10.3] (mask-on) (P = 0.115), respectively. "Air hunger" was the primary sensory descriptor of mask-related dyspnea. Vital capacity (VC) < 80% of the predicted value was a significant risk factor for worsening sensory dimension scores when wearing masks (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 5.5 [1.16-26.1], P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that patients with NTM-PD or bronchiectasis, particularly those with VC <80% of the predicted value, are likely to experience the sensory dimension of dyspnea during exercise while wearing surgical facemasks.

Prolonged facemask wearing among hospital workers and dry eye - a mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged facemask wearing may have negatively affected essential workers with dry eye. We conducted a mixed-methods study to examine and understand the associations of the ocular surface, periocular environment, and dry eye-related symptoms among hospital workers across the job spectrum with prolonged facemask use. METHODS: We recruited clinical and non-clinical hospital workers with self-reported symptoms of dry eye and prolonged facemask use. We measured symptoms using the 5-item Dry Eye Questionnaire and the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Objective ocular signs included corneal and conjunctival staining, fluorescein tear break up time (TBUT), meibography, tear film interferometry, and periocular humidity. We compared symptoms and signs across levels of periocular humidity, dry eye severity, facemask type, and job type. Participants with moderate or severe dry eye symptoms (OSDI > = 23) were invited for a semi-structured, one-on-one interview. RESULTS: We enrolled 20 clinical and 21 non-clinical hospital workers: 27% were 40 years or older, 76% were female, 29% reported a race other than White, and 20% were Hispanic. Seventeen individuals participated in the semi-structured interviews. From the quantitative analyses, we found that 90% of participants reported worsened severity of dry eye at work due to facemasks. Although wearing facemasks resulted in higher periocular humidity levels compared with not wearing facemasks, 66% participants reported increased airflow over their eyes. Findings from the qualitative interviews supported the finding that use of facemasks worsened dry eye symptoms, especially when facemasks were not fitted around the nose. The data did not suggest that non-clinical hospital workers experienced a greater impact of dry eye than clinical workers. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare providers and patients with dry eye should be educated about the discomfort and the ocular surface health risks associated with inadequately fitted facemasks. Wearing a fitted facemask with a pliable nose wire appears to mitigate the upward airflow.

The use of face masks and the impact on heart rate variability during baseline ECG

We compared electrocardiograms (ECGs) findings with one year difference between each other with and without use of face mask at the moment to be tested. The first ECG was done one year before without face mask, and the second ECG with a mask one year later after 3 months of mandatory use for epidemiological COVID-19 pandemic justifications in healthy youth elite athletes.ResultsRegarding heart rate variability (HRV), an increase in RMSSD was recorded when the test was performed with a mask (M): 108.5 ± 90 ms vs. No mask (NM): 72.9 ± 54.2 ms (p <0.002). And also an increase in SDNN, when the test was done with a M: 86.2 ± 47.2 ms vs. NM: 65.9 ± 43.5 ms (p <0.036).ConclusionsThe results on ECG are consistent with the increasing predominance of parasympathetic regulation, which is responsible for regulation of the autonomic loop when the subject is using face mask. (AU)